As cyber threats evolve, organizations must prioritize secure remote access solutions. Traditionally, Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) are the go-to for secure connectivity. However, Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) is emerging as a higher alternative, offering enhanced security and flexibility.
This article compares ZTNA and VPNs, analyzing their strengths, weaknesses, and suitability for modern cybersecurity challenges.
Thanks to Aztech
Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) is a cybersecurity framework that implements strict access controls based on identity, device security posture, and contextual factors. Unlike VPNs, ZTNA follows the Zero Trust principle—”never trust, always verify.”
Also read: Top 15 Essential Open Source Cyber Security Tools for 2025
ZTNA functions on a software-defined perimeter (SDP) that verifies user identity, device security posture, and contextual data before granting access. Instead of allowing broad network access, ZTNA enables users to connect only to authorized applications and resources through a cloud-based broker or gateway. This architecture enhances security by segmenting access and reducing the attack surface.
ZTNA works with an identity provider to authenticate users and devices and applies multi-factor authentication (MFA) to additional secure remote connections.
It doesn’t rely on the public internet connection but also integrates with the cloud environment to ensure secure, seamless remote access solutions for remote and hybrid workers.
Thanks to Aztech
A Virtual Private Network (VPN) is a secure connection that encrypts data and routes it through a private server, masking the user’s IP address. VPNs are widely used for remote access, enabling employees to connect to corporate networks securely.
VPNs generally rely on protocols such as secure socket tunneling protocol (SSTP), Point-to-Point Tunnelling Protocol (PPTP), Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol (L2TP), and Internet Key Exchange Version 2 (IKEv2) to build a secure connection over the public Internet.
This means the user’s traffic is routed through the VPN client, which encrypts their data and gives them access to the necessary corporate resources, though often with less granular control than ZTNA.
Also Read: Unlock Unlimited Streaming with 10 Best VPNs
Feature | VPN | ZTNA |
Security Model | Perimeter-based security | Zero Trust principle |
Access Control | Broad network access | Granular, least-privilege access |
Performance | Can be slow due to encryption overhead | Optimized cloud-native connectivity |
Scalability | Difficult to scale for large enterprises | Easily scalable across cloud and hybrid environments |
Attack Surface | Higher risk due to full network access | Reduced attack surface with application-specific access |
Implementation | Easier but may require more security measures | More complex but offers superior security |
Choosing between ZTNA and VPN depends on your organization’s security needs and infrastructure:
Here are the factors to consider while choosing ZTNA and VPN solutions:
If minimizing the attack surface and controlling access to specific applications are top priorities, ZTNA offers better protection through granular control.
ZTNA solutions are usually more scalable, especially in the cloud environments. VPNs may become less efficient as more remote workers connect.
If your organization uses a fusion of on-premise and cloud resources, ZTNA may be the better option, as it flawlessly integrates with cloud platforms.
VPNs can sometimes cause performance issues, while ZTNA offers a more seamless user experience with fewer slowdowns.
VPNs are usually cheaper upfront, but the higher security risks and management complexity can increase costs in the long run.
While VPNs have been a trusted solution for years, ZTNA offers a more advanced and secure approach to remote access. As cyber threats become more sophisticated, businesses should consider transitioning to ZTNA to enhance security, reduce attack surfaces, and improve performance. The future of cybersecurity lies in Zero Trust models, making ZTNA the preferred choice for modern enterprises.
The key difference between a traditional VPN and SASE is that VPNs secure only the connection, while SASE combines network and security services in the cloud. SASE offers more comprehensive protection for remote and cloud environments, whereas VPNs are more traditional and limited to access networks.
An always-on VPN provides continuous, broader access to networks, while ZTNA operates on a zero-trust principle, granting access to particular applications after verifying the user’s identity and device security. This means ZTNA offers more secure and limited access to networks than VPNs.
While ZTNA can be more complex to implement due to its integration with identity and cloud services, its long-term security benefits make it valuable.
ZTNA has many advantages over VPN, including broader checks of both user and device, more granular access granted, and ongoing checks. These measures make it more difficult for bad actors to gain and maintain access to resources.
We’re entering a thrilling time for AR and VR, as these technologies are starting to…
VMware is a leading provider of virtualization software, with products like VMware vSphere at the…
What is SCP Command? The Secure Copy Protocol (SCP) is a secure file transfer protocol…
Have you ever been involved in copying files from Kubernetes Pods to a local machine?…
At the Channel Partners Conference & Expo, Platform9, a leader in enterprise private cloud solutions,…
VMware is the leader in virtualization and cloud technology, offering solutions that revolutionize data center…